![iridient x-transformer and fujifilm film simulation iridient x-transformer and fujifilm film simulation](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/53c631e4e4b0c4d68989cbef/1427703082289-U1TIGEOSM7QJ5A7LK546/image-asset.jpeg)
- #IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER AND FUJIFILM FILM SIMULATION FULL#
- #IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER AND FUJIFILM FILM SIMULATION PRO#
- #IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER AND FUJIFILM FILM SIMULATION SOFTWARE#
- #IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER AND FUJIFILM FILM SIMULATION PROFESSIONAL#
#IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER AND FUJIFILM FILM SIMULATION PROFESSIONAL#
If you are not a professional photographer and have some appreciation for art & craftsmanship, you should definitely consider a mirrorless (certainly the XT100) over ugly and bulky DSLRs. I personally switched to an MFT (Olympus OMD EM 10 II), and love the fact that I have DSLR like quality (and better features in some respect), in such a small form factor of a mirror-less camera. The pictures right out of the camera are brilliant (even without the X Trans sensor). Bunch of options and aids that will help someone mature to become a better photographer. Nice kit lens (and access to brilliant X mount Fuji lenses)Ĥ. It absolutely isn't "a meat pie, horrible in fact".I purchased this for my wife, and the design, size, & more importantly the accessibility for a learner, made it a great pick.įujifilm doesn't make cheap stuff, so you get what you pay for:Ĥ. But not for me.Īnd frankly, LR really isn't as bad as you make out. So, it's almost definitely worth it for the hobbyist, and for professionals who work with a very limited number of finished files per shoot where the small, localised improvements Iridient makes in very specific areas of the image are part and parcel of the work they're delivering. I'd say I'd end up with at least 3-4TB of data per year to store, whereas with raf files it's just 1TB on average.Īlso, hate to say it, but I’ve tried a bunch of Iridient settings and to be honest at the size my clients are viewing and printing their files the difference, while occasionally noticeable at 100% if you know where to look, doesn’t warrant the extra storage space I’d need to invest in. Multiply that by say 500 minimum, more like 700, and easily 900 before a final cull during the editing process, and it’s generating a completely impractical amount of data for me to store. Converting an XT3 raf to dng almost quadruples the size of each file. As a wedding and event photographer I am working with hundreds and hundreds of culled raw files at a time. Unfortunately that tool is completely unsuitable for my work. Trust me I’ve read everything about LR, Iridient, C1, everything, and all of TF’s great articles. Others would have to weigh in on that issue.ĭepends *entirely* on what sort of photography you're doing, John. However, the Phase One cameras are in a very different price class, so maybe that's not an issue. The only open question might be how the support is going to be for the GFX series, which is a competitor for the medium format cameras made by Phase One, which is the same company as Capture One.
#IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER AND FUJIFILM FILM SIMULATION SOFTWARE#
It's clear that Capture One cares enough about Fuji cameras to work directly with Fuji and make a special edition of their powerful software just for Fuji, and Fuji has enough confidence with the Capture One developers to work with them directly.
![iridient x-transformer and fujifilm film simulation iridient x-transformer and fujifilm film simulation](https://fujiaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/CaptureOneFujiFilmSim.jpg)
![iridient x-transformer and fujifilm film simulation iridient x-transformer and fujifilm film simulation](http://christweedphoto.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/compare.jpg)
I will be getting an XT3 as soon as I get the money together, and I will also be switching to Capture One Pro. And the new XT3 sensor is a significant advance again, with a very visible edge in quality over the sensor in my XT20. It recovers more out of the shadows and highlights and does it more cleanly, and its overall capabilities give me much more control and are a joy to use.
![iridient x-transformer and fujifilm film simulation iridient x-transformer and fujifilm film simulation](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/53c631e4e4b0c4d68989cbef/1427711530063-A9FDILI3OBZG1NCE0V0U/image-asset.jpeg)
However, Capture One absolutely does get a lot more out of the RAFs from my XT20 (same sensor as the XT2) than Lightroom does. I can't do direct comparisons between the XT3 in Lightroom and Capture One yet, because LR doesn't support its RAFs yet.
#IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER AND FUJIFILM FILM SIMULATION FULL#
I was able to test an XT3 for a full day at the show, with the 50-140 2.8 lens, and since then I've been testing the files I got with Capture One and comparing them to the results in Lightroom.
#IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER AND FUJIFILM FILM SIMULATION PRO#
He strongly recommended the new Capture One Pro Fujifilm edition, explaining that the developers at Capture One had worked very closely with Fuji to be able to get as much as possible out of the Fuji RAW files. I've been using Lightroom exclusively for quite a while, but at the Photokina 2018 last week I had a long conversation with a Fuji rep who does frequent training programs in the Cologne area.